Cloning is a Medical Fraud
- Babette Francis, published in the Herald Sun, 7 Feb 2006

The Lockhart Committee, established by the Federal Government to review Australia's 2002 legislation banning human cloning and restricting embryo experimentation, held consultations last year to which members of scientific and community organizations and interested individuals were invited.

I attended one such meeting in Melbourne: the participants fell into two categories - representatives of medical-scientific institutions lobbying for cloning and unrestricted embryo experimentation, and representatives of pro-life groups, expressing the view that cloning and destruction of embryos for stem cells is an attack on human life and an affront to human dignity, besides being useless, while stem cells from ethical sources such as adult tissue and umbilical cords are producing treatments for a range of diseases.

There was a third group whose plight was poignant. These were individuals suffering from serious diseases - a man in a wheel chair, another with cystic fibrosis and two young women who had such severe neurological conditions they had difficulty speaking. None of the scientists had the fortitude to inform the disabled that there would be nothing from cloning or embryos to help them in the foreseeable future.

Instead, opponents of cloning and embryo destruction were depicted as "lacking in compassion". Why can't scientists tell the disabled that embryonic stem cells cause tumours, have not cured anything and there is nothing on the horizon, whereas stem cells from ethical sources have been effective in treating over 65 different conditions? The exploitation of the disabled like Christopher Reeve and Parkinson-sufferer, Michael J. Fox, is indefensible.

Seoul National University has confirmed Hwang Woo Suk and associates had fabricated and manipulated evidence in his published papers, had never cloned a human embryo or created the claimed eleven embryonic cell lines. Patients from around the world, lured by promised cures for spinal cord injuries, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and juvenile diabetes had flocked to his laboratory - more cruel exploitation of the ill.

I once asked Professor Joel Brind (Professor of Endocrinology, City University New York) in the context of the cover-up of the link between induced abortion and breast cancer, how scientists could tell such lies. He replied: "These people are willing to kill small babies and destroy human embryos. Why is it surprising they tell a few lies?"

The lies extend beyond Dr. Hwang and his collaborators. There is the prestigious "peer-reviewed" journal which published his work as authentic, there is the compliant media which eulogized him and overlooked the fact that to produce his cloned dog, Snuppy, over l,000 dog embryos were used. For any human "treatment" that would involve the destruction of human embryos on a mass scale. Also overlooked was the bribery and coercion of Korean women to provide eggs for Dr. Hwang.

Dr Leon Kass, former chairman of President Bush's Council on Bioethics, expressed his scorn for the legion of Dr Hwang's former supporters: "Scientific fraud is always revolting .... but in this case, American scientists and the American media have been complicit in the fraud,
because of their zeal in the politics of stem-cell and cloning research and their hostility to the
Bush funding policy. Concerted efforts have been made these past five years to hype
therapeutic cloning, including irresponsible promises of cures around the corner and
'personalized repair kits' for every degenerative disease. The need to support these wild
claims and the desire to embarrass cloning opponents led to the accelerated publication of Dr
Hwang's 'findings'... We even made him Exhibit A for the false claim that our moral scruples are causing American science to fall behind."

This is also the false accusation leveled at opponents of cloning and embryo experimentation in Australia - that we would fall behind in research, that our scientists would leave.... well let 'em. Let's reserve taxpayers' funding for ethical scientists and for ethical stem cell treatments which have the runs on the board, and reject the Lockhart Recommendations which even support animal-human hybrids. Do we really need a "super" embryo combining cells from Snuppy and Dr. Hwang?